Executive summary
A plain-English overview of what was reviewed, the main themes, and the highest-priority fixes.
Home / What you receive
What’s included
Security reports your team can fix from, explain, and reuse.
A good report should not just list vulnerabilities. It should show what was tested, why each finding matters, how to reproduce it safely, and what to do next.
Plain-English summaryTechnical evidenceFix guidance
We separate material risk from low-value noise. Engineers get reproducible evidence, and decision-makers get a clear view of what needs attention first.
What was covered
Scope, access, assumptions, constraints, and exclusions.
Technical findings
Affected assets or workflows, evidence, reproduction steps, impact, and remediation guidance.
Follow-up
Notes to help your team prioritise, retest, document exclusions, and explain the result internally or to customers.
Clear supporting evidence
Manual validation keeps the report honest.
Automated tools can surface leads quickly. Manual validation checks whether the issue is real, reachable, exploitable, and worth prioritising.
- What could an attacker or unauthorised user do?
- Which roles, systems, records, or workflows are affected?
- What evidence proves the issue?
- What should the team change?
- How should the fix be retested?
Illustrative example
What a finding looks like.
This synthetic example shows the format and level of evidence to expect. It is not a client case study, testimonial, or claim about a past engagement.
Cross-account access to customer records
A user with access to one account can request another record by changing an object identifier. The issue exposes cross-tenant data.
Evidence
Validated with two test accounts and a replayed request showing cross-account access.
Impact
Unauthorised access to records belonging to a different customer or business unit.
Remediation
Enforce server-side ownership checks on every record lookup and add regression tests for role and tenant boundaries.
Retest
Repeat the original request pair after the fix and confirm the API returns a denial without leaking record metadata.
Representative engagement scenarios
Common reasons teams ask for a report.
These examples reflect common moments when teams need a report they can act on.
Pre-launch product review
An application test before launch with fix-ready findings for engineering and a launch-readiness summary for leadership.
Infrastructure change review
An infrastructure engagement after remote-access, identity, or cloud changes with findings that hold up in internal review.
AI workflow rollout
An AI review before assistants or automation touch sensitive data, approvals, or high-trust operational actions.
Posture assessment
For leadership and procurement when broader control issues need attention.
Clear supporting evidence
Request a quote.
Tell us who needs the report and what decision it has to support.