AI security review
We test assistants, copilots, internal AI tools, retrieval systems, and AI-enabled products for prompt abuse, data leakage, over-broad retrieval, and unsafe defaults.
AI security review
We look past the demo and follow the data, approvals, tool permissions, and side effects around the model.
We test assistants, copilots, internal AI tools, retrieval systems, and AI-enabled products for prompt abuse, data leakage, over-broad retrieval, and unsafe defaults.
We check systems that chain tasks, call tools, update records, or act beyond static text generation.
We validate what the assistant can retrieve, summarise, cite, infer, or expose from internal and customer data.
We check whether AI speed has quietly removed approval, widened access, or made accountability harder to see.
Why AI review is different
We review data paths, retrieval boundaries, tool access, approvals, logging, and the ways model errors or manipulation can affect real work.
AI review
It applies when the system affects customer-facing decisions, runs inside privileged workflows, or produces outputs people rely on without checking.
This includes internal assistants, knowledge retrieval layers, secure automation, back-office automation, and products with AI in the workflow.
We define the review around the data sources, tool permissions, rollout timing, approval path, and evidence your team needs.
For example, a support copilot that retrieves CRM data and creates tickets should be reviewed for exposure, permissions, approvals, and an audit trail.
AI changes the attack surface because it changes how people and systems retrieve information, make decisions, approve work, and act.
Launch and risk planning
Tell us what it can access, what it can do, and who approves the outcome.