Boundaries agreed before testing
We agree target systems, exclusions, access, timing, communication, and report audience before testing starts.
Home / Methodology
Methodology
The aim is simple: agree what is safe to test, check the findings properly, and give you a report that stands up when engineers, leaders, or customers ask questions.
We agree target systems, exclusions, access, timing, communication, and report audience before testing starts.
Tools help find signals. Important findings are checked manually so the report reflects real exposure rather than scanner noise.
Findings show what was observed, who or what is affected, why it matters, and what should change next.
Reports are written so technical and non-technical teams can use the same evidence in different conversations.
Service line depth
An app test, infrastructure review, posture assessment, and AI review each need different depth. The standard stays the same: agreed boundaries, manual checking, and evidence people can use.
References
Frameworks help when they clarify the review, not when they add paperwork. Where useful, the work can align with OWASP, cloud and identity guidance, the Essential Eight, or NIST-style controls.
Keep reporting practical.
AI review follows the same rule: prompts are only one input. Permissions, retrieval boundaries, tool access, approvals, logging, and workflow design shape what the system can do.
Request a quote
Tell us about the system, timeline, and decision you need to support.